Now you can download the book “Understanding Muhammad” for free in Hindi. Many of you kept asking for a free copy of that book and Ali Sina sent you the older edition. Ali Sina saw the value of this book in freeing Muslims from the yoke of Islam and recognized that many Muslims, especially those living in Islamic countries cannot afford to purchase it.
First, here is what John Quincy Adams said about Mohammed:“He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE. emphasis in the original”Here is what he said about the Quaran:“The precept of the koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.”Here is what Thomas Jefferson said:“Verily I say these are the false shepherds foretold as to enter not by the door into the sheepfold, but to climb up some other way. They are mere usurpers of the Christian name, teaching a counter-religion made up of the deliria of crazy imaginations, as foreign from Christianity as is that of Mahomet.”Adams and Jefferson asked the ambassador to Tripoli, Mr. Adja, why the Muslims of the Maghrib, the “Barbary pirates” as they were known in the West, did as they did.
He had no trouble answering them, as the report written by Jefferson and Adams to the Continental Congress shows:“that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”. Please take a look at list of terrorist organizations in wiki. Why are most of them Islamic?Because it is Muslims carry it out.– –Another question, both Budhhists and Muslims are being oppressed by Chinese. But why only Muslims kill innocents there and not Budhhists?What are you on about?en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008Tibetanunrest– –Another one, you people say that terrorism is invented by West and Israel. Why they can’t do it with other religions? Why only Islam?What are you on about?
Terrorism did start in West. However it is “hardly” by Muslims.– –Muslims are in conflict with:1)Christians – RussiaYes. But i don’t think they are Christians. It is a FACT that it was dear Russia oppressing Muslims. So how is it Muslim fault?– –2)Jews – IsraelSo how would you like if your home was violated and invaded? Muslims take no shit.– –3)Atheists – ChinaSo if you claim Chinese are oppressing Muslims there then how come Muslims are to blame?– –4)Hindus – IndiaOutside of Kashmir – there is no real Hindu Vs Muslims in India. Muslims are part of EVERY aspects of Indian life.
Bollywood to Politics.– –5)Sikhs – Punjab(before Punjab was divided)Make belief.– –6)Buddhists – MyanmarAnd who is the terrorist there?– –7)Among themselves – MEWhat does this mean?– –Why can’t they get along with anyone?Let us see this is nit-picking conflicts where Muslims are involved and then you mentioned EVERY place where Muslims aren’t even responsible!– –So try answering your own stupid question! And I like how you nicely avoided mentioning West. West and its terrorism. You said lack of knowledge is ignorance.Correct!So why did you state it was stupidity?– –But what if you have access to information and still choose to remain ignorant,then it’s safe to say you are at least stupid.Your silly standard as humans have limited capacity to learn and retain info. Hence given your repeated atrocious ignorance, then by your own measure, you are very stupid.– –Notice the Indian sub-continent and Egyptian civilizations predate the Chinese.Notice how pathetic a liar you are to mention Egyptian again. As for Chinese Vs Indian.And by your own link you lied!
Pretty incredible!Indus civilizationca. 2500-1500 BC Vedic ageca. 1500-500 BC Indian kingdom ageca. 500 BC-1200 ADancient China (Xia Shang Western Zhou Han)ca.
2000 BC-500 ADThis states beginning of India Civilization – beginning of the Vedic age happened AFTER and concurrent to ancient Chinese civilization. I said:Who mentioned anything about civilization? Besides,Indian and Egyptian civilizations precede the Chinese.”Amin:Oh look! Another mistake of yours which I have caught!
Oh dear how mistake ridden you really are!Full of ignorance and stupidity//You said lack of knowledge is ignorance.Correct! But what if you have access to information and still choose to remain ignorant,then it’s safe to say you are at least stupid.Notice the Indian sub-continent and Egyptian civilizations predate the Chinese. @Amin Riadh: Please take a look at list of terrorist organizations in wiki. Why are most of them Islamic?Just answer this simple question. Don’t come up with “Wiki is owned by Zionists ” and such crap.Another question, both Budhhists and Muslims are being oppressed by Chinese.
But why only Muslims kill innocents there and not Budhhists?Another one, you people say that terrorism is invented by West and Israel. Why they can’t do it with other religions? Why only Islam?Muslims are in conflict with:1)Christians – Russia2)Jews – Israel3)Atheists – China4)Hindus – India5)Sikhs – Punjab(before Punjab was divided)6)Buddhists – Myanmar7)Among themselves – MEDon’t forget Africa and Philipinnies.Why can’t they get along with anyone?.
You make very little sense.Your contention is that locking people (criminals) up is barbaric,even sending them to rehab.How so? State your reasons and what are the alternatives from an Islamic view? A quick death?When I stated that locking people up was and is barbaric then you mustered out:“Sending drug offenders to rehab is not barbaric”Er how is locking people up and this one and same?“Your contention is that locking people (criminals) up is barbaric”Yes it is.“even sending them to rehab.How so?”Now, now.
Your vile dishonesty added that. So you answer it.I only said locking people up is barbaric. Which it is.Did you really think I will for that? So you make it all up and I am meant to answer!My contention as you put it is that locking people up is barbaric form of punishment. And that is it.Now I am perfectly willing to explain this.
Any deceitful additions by you then you answer them.Ha, ha! Now answer son what is it you want me to explain?– –And who labelled them as such? One again your “lying” come to fore. So what happened to locking people up? //You stated before that virtually all punishments are barbaric.“I gave you examples of punishments that does not inflict the type of brutality found in Sharia and now you accuse me of lying,your favorite ‘go to’ response.Really pathetic.”Lol!
Drug rehabilitation is NOT punishment it is rehabilitation!See! More of your lying and stupidity eh! What is punishment:“the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offence.”What is Rehabilitation:“restore (someone) to health or normal life by training and therapy after imprisonment, addiction, or illness.”So why did you mix these two up?A very nice example of the Equivocation Fallacy. Do look it up:– –We don’t punish nor lock people up for blasphemy and apostasy.So the Islamic alternative of a quick death is completely beside the point,ridiculous and barbaric.No. Blasphemy has no meaning in West anymore.“apostasy” There is version of it treason.– – And which societies are these? Which “spies” have you seen being crucified? Are we talking about USA and its repeated tortures?
//“And those perpetrators are reminded that they have violated our laws.Unlike in Islam where such brutal acts are mandated.” Quit lying. USA torture victims are and have been mostly innocent. And this “torture” was outlawed. Supposedly a law to which USA subscribed. But then carried out this torture in secrecy.You held this up as supposedly Islamic only punishment and now have become unstuck.– –“Yes,Islam suppresses the moral intuition of its adherents through threats of death and barbaric lashings for heretical thoughts.”Oh dear! More lying from you!
Now do give examples say from the quran. It should be easy for you to do. See how your lying work you lie and then moan about it when picked up.Here is a clear chance prove you are NOT lying by justifying this.– –.Amin is fond of calling people liars,since these accusations are unjustified,it’s clear he’s projecting.So if these accusations are “unjustified” then why have you failed to show WHY they are unjustified?A baseless accusation is easy to highlight. Given that you have failed answer the accusation shows that the accusation of you lying is correct.Furthermore:“it’s clear he’s projecting”See – I am going to show you up as stupid right now!
– so if I have lied about something then do state what the lie is just like I did!See how easy it was to expose your baseless accusation? And see how you are such a failure?– –He calls everyone stupid,yet asks really dumb questions like what is “mathematical analysis” and what’s “moral intuition”Really? So what exactly are those 2 things?
And why is that you seem not know yourself? And are trying to pretend such things exist? Why not show everyone!Which mathematical analysis did the Indians invent? Do answer!Ha ha ha ha!– –Has no idea what the scientific revolution is and thinks the Chinese were the earliest civilization.Lol! Ha ha ha!“and thinks the Chinese were the earliest civilization”Incorrect dear! And either you are deliberately lying or your comprehension is low and couldn’t understand the reply. I am going for deliberately lying.
Now words of mine state that Chinese were the earliest Civilization on earth.So why did you not bother to answer what a “scientific revolution” is? Here I will help:– –He cannot debate like a scholar,instead argues like a child and uses vulgarities.Do point examples of vulgarities by me?Oh and is this you debating like a scholar or whining?“Thanks for advertising your stupidity and childishness for the public. Your dumb questions are also duly noted.”So you deliberately “lying” is that debating like a scholar?.
“Amin,accussing people of lying is not a counter argument that can be defended without specifics.You need to learn how to debate like a scholar.”You a scholar? What are you on about?
You don’t know how to debate never mind like a “scholar”. Ha, ha, ha.And this lines means nothing. If the accusation of lying is false then show why. Else it isn’t you are liar who has lied.
Your lie still remains there. You have done nothing to show WHY the lie isn’t a lie. Hence it is a lie.– –“See,right there,you’re a typical example of a manchild (a little boy trapped inside an adult’s body).Try arguing like an adult.”Boo hoo is this you arguing like an adult?
Posting creepy lies then claiming you are arguing like and adult? Doesn’t work.Like I said after telling a lie then making excuses has never worked.– – –“You have no idea what the scientific revolution is,do you?”No dear. It is YOU who doesn’t.
Else you would have explained it.– – –“You must have had an imaginary discussion with yourself because I have only one username.”Lol! Pretend away but your petty rhetoric and stupidity are same. Now, my enemy there isn’t all that many places you can run to.– –Lol!
What exactly is:“mathematical analysis ”And:“astronomical model”Of what? Your backside? //Thanks for advertising your stupidity and childishness for the public. Your dumb questions are also duly noted.Apparently you’ve never heard of the terms “mathematical analysis” and “astronomical model”,even though you could easily search for their meanings.Yes. Or you could have done it show this “stupidity” although lack of knowledge is known IGNORANCE and not stupidity see how I showed your stupidity right there?There is no such specific thing. Don’t just duly note question but answer and when you see you cannot then this will reveal your ignorance and stupidity.I am 100% right.
You didn’t know what you are on about. Hence this poor answer.Is this how you “adults” argue? When your mistakes are highlighted then rather than answering you pretend you are right lol!Like I said I will show you up every time.Where will you run to?– – –“Who mentioned anything about civilization?
Besides,Indian and Egyptian civilizations precede the Chinese.”Oh look! Another mistake of yours which I have caught! Oh dear how mistake ridden you really are!Full of ignorance and stupidity– – –This comment is supposed to refute what? The fact that the Chinese though the earth was flat up until the 17th century?And what of it? So did other such as the Indians. Until told otherwise. What has this got to do with anything?.
Hence, my point remains, locking people up is Barbaric.//You make very little sense.Your contention is that locking people (criminals) up is barbaric,even sending them to rehab.How so? State your reasons and what are the alternatives from an Islamic view? A quick death?And who labelled them as such? One again your “lying” come to fore. So what happened to locking people up? //You stated before that virtually all punishments are barbaric.I gave you examples of punishments that does not inflict the type of brutality found in Sharia and now you accuse me of lying,your favorite ‘go to’ response.Really pathetic.Hardly. As explained locking people up is often far more Barbaric then quick death.
See how you tried to lie your way past? //We don’t punish nor lock people up for blasphemy and apostasy.So the Islamic alternative of a quick death is completely beside the point,ridiculous and barbaric.And which societies are these? Which “spies” have you seen being crucified? Are we talking about USA and its repeated tortures?
//And those perpetrators are reminded that they have violated our laws.Unlike in Islam where such brutal acts are mandated.Atta boy! Hence claiming Muslims somehow lack this shows your hatred and bigotry.//Yes,Islam suppresses the moral intuition of its adherents through threats of death and barbaric lashings for heretical thoughts.There can exist no freedom because the ideology is enforced with promises of beheadings.And since freedom is a necessary presupposition for morality,Islam cannot be moral without freedom and choice. //In other words I was right. You couldn’t.
And if this charge was so false – then why weren’t you able to explain EXACTLY why it was so? Given you couldn’t explain it this shows it was not a false charge.//Amin,accussing people of lying is not a counter argument that can be defended without specifics.You need to learn how to debate like a scholar.I will keep doing this to you keep rubbing your face in.
Enjoy being made fool of by a mere Muslim. Then curse your parents – for genes and providing you with quality education.//See,right there,you’re a typical example of a manchild (a little boy trapped inside an adult’s body).Try arguing like an adult.Incorrect. During their reign it did! What are you on about? Try reading their respective history.//You have no idea what the scientific revolution is,do you?Yes.
Which shows you are Indian. And after I shut your other account up I will do the same to you here.Because you lack the brains, the knowledge and the education. //You must have had an imaginary discussion with yourself because I have only one username.Lol! What exactly is:“mathematical analysis ”And:“astronomical model”Of what? Your backside? //Thanks for advertising your stupidity and childishness for the public. Your dumb questions are also duly noted.Apparently you’ve never heard of the terms “mathematical analysis” and “astronomical model”,even though you could easily search for their meanings.Chinese civ occurred before either and it pumped India India mostly is cross between Europeans and Chinese after all.Keep your baseless and ignorant racism to yourself.//Who mentioned anything about civilization?
Besides,Indian and Egyptian civilizations precede the Chinese.Lol! As did the Indians. How vile!//This comment is supposed to refute what? The fact that the Chinese though the earth was flat up until the 17th century?.
“Your false charges don’t need defending”In other words I was right. You couldn’t. And if this charge was so false – then why weren’t you able to explain EXACTLY why it was so? Given you couldn’t explain it this shows it was not a false charge.I will keep doing this to you keep rubbing your face in. Enjoy being made fool of by a mere Muslim.
Then curse your parents – for genes and providing you with quality education.– –“And yet the scientific revolution did not occur in any of those nations.”Incorrect. During their reign it did! What are you on about?
Try reading their respective history.– –“It’s entirely conceivable that it could have occurred in India.”Yes. Which shows you are Indian. And after I shut your other account up I will do the same to you here.Because you lack the brains, the knowledge and the education.– –“They had developed the mathematical analysis and an astronomical model but they had not yet invented the scientific method.”Lol! What exactly is:“mathematical analysis ”And:“astronomical model”Of what? Your backside?– –“Chinese were influenced by the indians,muslims and christians.”Chinese civ occurred before either and it pumped India India mostly is cross between Europeans and Chinese after all.Keep your baseless and ignorant racism to yourself.– –They would have remained followers in the scientific field and not leaders.In fact,the chinese thought the earth was flat in the 17th century until Jesuit priests convinced them otherwise.Lol!
As did the Indians. And what exactly are those? Virtually every single “punishment” is barbaric. Locking people up for a life time is “arguably” far more barbaric than a quick death.//-Sending drug offenders to rehab is not barbaricLocking people up to rehab for drug offenses. No sunshine I do not allow such dishonesty. The two are not the same.Hence, my point remains, locking people up is Barbaric.– –-Neither are court-ordered anger management classes-How is a traffic fine a barbaric penalty?-Neither are community service or probation barbaric punishments.And who labelled them as such?
One again your “lying” come to fore. So what happened to locking people up?– –“Punishments fit the crime in civilized societies.”Hardly. As explained locking people up is often far more Barbaric then quick death. See how you tried to lie your way past?Hasn’t worked in the past for you what made you think it lying going to work again?– –“Unlike Islamic societies that behead apostates and blasphemers.Crucify spies.Stone adulterers and amputate the limbs of thieves.”And which societies are these? Which “spies” have you seen being crucified? Are we talking about USA and its repeated tortures?– –“The innate ability to distinguish between good and evil,without conscious reasoning.”Atta boy! Hence claiming Muslims somehow lack this shows your hatred and bigotry.– –“Spoken like a true muslim.If I’m of no benefit to anyone (namely muslims) then I’m not worthy of having my head attached.”You ain’t benefit to anyone not with these kind of lies and stupidity step up son!Exposed as “worthless” in the past and I will keep doing it to you.– –Oh and try responding now.
And what exactly are those? Virtually every single “punishment” is barbaric.
Locking people up for a life time is “arguably” far more barbaric than a quick death.//-Sending drug offenders to rehab is not barbaric-Neither are court-ordered anger management classes-How is a traffic fine a barbaric penalty?-Neither are community service or probation barbaric punishments.Punishments fit the crime in civilized societies.Unlike Islamic societies that behead apostates and blasphemers.Crucify spies.Stone adulterers and amputate the limbs of thieves.What is a “moral intuition”? Try defining that first//The innate ability to distinguish between good and evil,without conscious reasoning.Now is there any use of you keeping yours? What difference do you make to anyone? //Spoken like a true muslim.If I’m of no benefit to anyone (namely muslims) then I’m not worthy of having my head attached.
“Unfortunately,the muslim rulers did not see the value in his work,which was welcomed with open arms in Christian Europe.”People like you are immoral therefore keen on lying. I have caught your previous lies did you defend any? No.And you won’t be able defend this lie either– –“and for this reason the scientific revolution occured in Europe instead of the Middle East”All major Civilizations have had their time Chinese, Egyptians, Arabs-Persian, Indians Finally European – the darkest of all people.What goes around comes around. It is already the beginning of the end of Europe.
More nonsense. You won’t comment when I am around to put you in your place.– –“Muslim leaders enforce Islamic “moral” principles through barbaric punishments”And what exactly are those? Virtually every single “punishment” is barbaric. Locking people up for a life time is “arguably” far more barbaric than a quick death.Timothy McVeigh – for example – what would have been the point of keeping him alive?– –“Thus muslims have no genuine moral intuition”What is a “moral intuition”? Try defining that first– –“except for the neccesity to avoid having your head chopped off.”Now is there any use of you keeping yours?
What difference do you make to anyone?– –I am here for you. Imagine a Muslim Einstein,There have been a few brilliant muslim scientists but none stands out as much as Alhazen,the muslim version of Einstein.He is credited with inventing the scientific method long before European Christians knew about this method.Unfortunately,the muslim rulers did not see the value in his work,which was welcomed with open arms in Christian Europe.Muslims have their priorities screwed up,they value war more than science,and for this reason the scientific revolution occured in Europe instead of the Middle East.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna), 981-1037 C.E.ABU ALI AL-HUSSAIN IBN ABDALLAH IBN SINA (Avicenna) (981 - 1037 C.E.)byDr. ZahoorIbn Sina, known in the West by the name of Avicenna, was the most famous physician, philosopher, encyclopedist, mathematician and astronomer of his time. His major contribution to medical science was his famous book al-Qanun fi al-Tibb, known as the ' Canon' in the West. No deliberation on the science of medicine can be complete without a reference to Ibn Sina. Abu Ali al-Hussain Ibn Abdallah Ibn Sina was born in 981C.E.
At Afshana near Bukhara (Central Asia). By the age of ten he had become well versed in the study of the Qur'an and basic sciences.
He studied logic from Abu Abdallah Natili, a famous philosopher of the time and his study of philosophy included various Greek and Muslim books. In his youth he showed remarkable expertise in medicine and was well known in the region.
At the age of seventeen, he was successful in curing Nooh Ibn Mansoor, the King of Bukhara, of an illness in which all the well-known physicians had given up hope. On his recovery, King Mansoor wished to reward him, but the young physician only desired permission to use his uniquely stocked library.Ibn Sina traveled to Jurjan after his father's death where he met his famous contemporary. Later he moved to Rayy and then to Hamadan, where he wrote his famous book Al-Qanun fi al-Tibb. Here, he treated Shams al-Daulah, the King of Hamadan, for severe colic. From Hamadan he moved to Isphahan (present Iran), where he completed many of his monumental writings. Nevertheless, he continued travelling and the excessive mental exertion aswell as political turmoil spoilt his health.
Finally, he returned to Hamadan where he died in 1037 C.E.His major contribution to medical science was his famous book al-Qanun, known as the ' Canon' in the West. The Qanun fi al-Tibb (the Canons of Medicine) is an immense encyclopedia of medicine extending over a million words. It reviewed the medical knowledge available from ancient and Muslim sources. Due to its systematic approach, formal perfection as well as its intrinsic value, the Qanun superceded Razi's (Rhazes') Hawi, Ali ibn Abbas's Maliki, and even the works of Galen, and remained supreme for six centuries. Ibn Sina not only synthesized theavailable knowledge, but he also made many original contributions. The Qanun (pronounced Qanoon) deals with general medicines, drugs (seven hundred sixty), diseases affecting all parts of the body from head to foot, specially pathology and pharmacopoia. It was recognized as the mostauthentic materia medica.Among his original contributions are such advances as recognition of the contagious nature of phthisis and tuberculosis, distribution of diseases by water and soil, and interaction between psychology and health.
He was the first to describe meningitis and made rich contributions to anatomy, gynecology and child health. Also, he was the first physician who suggested the treatment for lachrymal fistula and introduced medical probe for the channel.Ibn Sina's Qanun contains many of his anatomical findings which are accepted even today. Ibn Sina was the first scientist to describe the minute and graphic description of different parts of the eye, such as conjuctive sclera, cornea, choroid, iris, retina, layer lens, aqueous humour, optic nerve and optic chiasma.Ibn Sina condemned conjectures and presumptions in anatomy and called upon physicians and surgeons to base their knowledge on a close study of human body. He observed that Aorta at its origin contains three valves which open when the blood rushes into it from the heart during contraction and closes during relaxation of the heart so that the blood may not be poured back into the heart. He asserts that muscular movements are possible because of the nerves supplied to them, and the perception of pain in the muscles is also due to the nerves. Further, he observes that liver spleen and kidney do not contain any nerves but the nerves are embedded in the covering of these organs.The Qanun (Canon) was translated into Latin by Gerard of Cremona in the twelfth century. It became the text book for medical education in the schools of Europe.
The demand for it may be appreciated from the fact that in the last thirty years of the fifteenth century it was issued sixteentimes - fifteen editions being in Latin and one in Hebrew, and that it was reissued more than twenty times during the sixteenth century. In 1930 Cameron Gruner partly translated this book into English entitled 'A Treatise on the Canons of Medicine of Avicenna.' From the twelfth to seventeenth centuries the Qanun served as the chief guide to medical science in the West. William Osler, author of the Evolution of Modern Science, writes: 'The Qanun has remained a medical bible for a longer period than any other work.' Ibn Sina's Kitab al-Shifa (Book of Healing) was a philosophical encyclopedia, covering a vast area of knowledge from philosophy to science. His philosophy synthesizes Aristotelian tradition, Neoplatonic influences and Muslim theology.
Kitab al-Shifa was known as 'Sanatio' in its Latin translation. Besides Shifa his well-known treatises in philosophy are al-Najat and Isharat. He classified the entire field into two major categories: the theoretical knowledge and the practical knowledge. The former included physics, mathematics and metaphysics, and the latter ethics, economics and politics.Ibn Sina also contributed to mathematics, physics, music and other fields. He made several astronomical observations, and devised a device similar to the vernier, to increase the precision of instrumental readings. In Physics, he contributed to the study of different forms of energy, heat, light and mechanical, and such concepts as force, vacuum and infinity.
He made the important observation that if the perception of light is due to the emission of some sort of particles by the luminous source, the speed of light must be finite. He propounded on an interconnection between time and motion, and also made investigations on specific gravity and used an air thermometer.In the field of Chemistry, he did not believe in the possibility of chemical transmutation in metals. These views were radically opposed to those prevailing at his time. His treatise on minerals wasone of the main sources of geology of Christian encyclopedist of the thirteenth century.In the field of Music, his contribution was an improvement over Farabi's (al-Pharabius) work and was far ahead of knowledge prevailing elsewhere on the subject. Doubling with the fourth and fifth was a 'great' step toward the harmonic system. Ibn Sina observed that in the series of consonances represented by (n+1)/n, the ear is unable to distinguish them when n = 45.Ibn Sina's portrait adorns the great hall of the Faculty of Medicine in the University of Paris.A Portrait of Ibn Sinafor Ibn Sina on Testing New Medicine.Copyright © 1992, 1997 Dr.
ZahoorAll Rights Reserved.
Comments are closed.
|
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |